Independent reference site. Not affiliated with SaaS Capital, Bessemer, or any M&A advisory firm. For informational purposes only -- not financial advice.

Public SaaS Valuation Multiples, 2026

EV/Revenue multiples for publicly traded SaaS companies, reconciled across the three primary indices: SaaS Capital, BVP Nasdaq Cloud, and Aventis Advisors.

6.4x
Median EV/Revenue
Q1 2026
13.8x
Top Quartile
Q1 2026
1.8x
Bottom Quartile
Q1 2026
~100
Index Constituents
Q1 2026
26.6x
Median EV/EBITDA
Q1 2026

The Three Public SaaS Indices Compared

Three primary indices report “median public SaaS EV/Revenue,” and they give materially different numbers. The divergence is methodology, not contradiction, each index measures a different constituent universe with a different weighting.

IndexMedian Q1 2026ConstituentsWeightingUpdate
SaaS Capital Index6.4x~100 pure-play public SaaSEqual-weighted medianMonthly
BVP Nasdaq Emerging Cloud Index8.0x60-80 cloud + SaaSMarket-cap weightedDaily (FRED: NASDAQEMCLOUD)
Aventis Advisors3.4xNarrower; excludes growth-stage outliersMethodology-specificQuarterly
Sources: SaaS Capital Index, BVP Cloud Index, Aventis Advisors. See our full reconciliation for which index applies to which use case.

The SaaS Capital Index is the most widely cited reference for “the” public SaaS multiple because it uses an equal-weighted median across the broadest pure-play universe. The BVP index runs higher because growth-tilted constituents and market-cap weighting both pull the average up. The Aventis number is lower because their constituent universe excludes some of the highest-multiple outliers. None is wrong; they answer different questions.

How the Three Indices Have Moved, 2018 to 2026

The three indices track the same underlying market but pick different constituents. Over an eight-year window, their movements are highly correlated, but the spread between them widens at extremes. The chart below plots quarterly median EV/Revenue for each index since Q4 2018. Note the synchronised peak in Q4 2021 (SaaS Capital 18.6x, BVP 28x, Aventis 15x) and the divergent reset since 2024, with Aventis pulling significantly below the other two as AI disruption concerns concentrate in their narrower sample.

0x10x20x30xMedian EV/Revenue (x)201820192020202120222023202420252026ZIRP-era peakRate-cycle resetAI repricing6.4x8.0x3.4x
SaaS Capital Index (median, ~100 cos)
BVP Cloud (median, 60-80 cos)
Aventis Advisors (median, ~70 cos)
Quarterly median public-SaaS EV/Revenue, three indices. Data points reconciled from each index's monthly/quarterly publications; see sources below. Values for the most recent quarter are the latest reported; older quarters use representative end-of-quarter snapshots.
SaaS Capital Index
Median EV/Revenue across ~100 publicly traded pure-play SaaS companies. Published monthly since 2013. Source for monthly observations.
Source ↗
BVP Nasdaq Emerging Cloud Index
Market-cap-weighted basket of 60-80 cloud and SaaS publics. Median multiple of constituents published in periodic Bessemer Cloud Index reports. Price level published daily as FRED series NASDAQEMCLOUD.
Source ↗
Aventis Advisors public SaaS sample
Sample of ~70 public SaaS companies, updated quarterly. Aventis methodology trims certain outliers more aggressively, producing systematically lower medians than SaaS Capital.
Source ↗
Full quarterly history table (17 quarters since 2018)
QuarterSaaS CapitalBVP CloudAventisNote
2018-Q48.2x11.4x7.5x
2019-Q29.1x12.0x8.2x
2019-Q410.0x13.5x9.0x
2020-Q211.5x16.0x10.0xCOVID-era rally beginning
2020-Q414.0x21.0x11.5x
2021-Q216.4x24.0x13.0x
2021-Q418.6x28.0x15.0xAll-time peak across all three indices
2022-Q28.0x11.0x7.5xRate-driven repricing, multiples cut in half within six months
2022-Q45.5x7.5x5.8x
2023-Q26.0x8.0x5.5x
2023-Q46.5x8.5x5.8x
2024-Q26.2x7.8x4.8x
2024-Q46.8x8.5x4.5x
2025-Q17.3x9.0x5.0xBrief AI-optimism spike
2025-Q26.1x8.0x4.2x
2025-Q46.6x8.2x4.0x
2026-Q16.4x8.0x3.4xAventis flags AI disruption as primary downward driver in early 2026
↓ Download as CSV·Values for older quarters reconcile to within ~0.3x across sources; see methodology cards above for index definitions.

Public SaaS Multiples by Growth Rate Cohort

YoY Growth BandMedian EV/RevenueP25 MultipleP75 Multiple
60%+ (high growth)11-18x8x22x
40-60%8-11x6x14x
20-40%5-8x3.5x10x
10-20%3-5x2x6x
Under 10%1-3x1x4x
Source: SaaS Capital Index Q4 2025 + BVP EMCLOUD data

Public SaaS Multiples by ARR Size

Larger public companies do not always command higher multiples. The law of large numbers typically means that at $1B+ ARR, growth rates naturally decelerate, compressing multiples. The premium tier belongs to mid-sized companies ($200M-$1B ARR) that are still growing rapidly while showing improving margins.

ARR RangeTypical EV/RevenueKey Dynamics
Under $500M ARR5-12xHigh growth if still scaling; wide range
$500M-$2B ARR6-15xPrime growth stage, best multiples
$2B+ ARR4-9xGrowth deceleration begins; margin focus

Notable Public SaaS Companies: Approximate Q1 2026 Multiples

Multiples shown are approximate and change daily. See company investor relations pages for exact current figures. EV/Revenue based on trailing 12-month revenue.

CompanyApprox. EV/RevenueGrowth Profile
Snowflake~15xHigh growth, usage-based, data cloud
Datadog~16xObservability, strong NRR
Monday.com~8xWork management, growth + profitable
HubSpot~6xCRM, moderate growth, improving margins
Salesforce~5xMature, high revenue, profitability focus
Braze~6xCustomer engagement, growing
Asana~4xLower growth, path to profitability
Veeva Systems~9xVertical SaaS (pharma), high NRR
Paycom~6xHR SaaS, profitable, moderate growth
Zendesk (private)~5xTaken private 2022 at ~7x; comparable

Notable 2024 to 2025 SaaS M&A Transactions

Public-market multiples reset when companies actually transact. Eight notable SaaS deals from this cycle, with multiples computed against disclosed ARR or LTM revenue at the time of announcement. Every row links to the closing press release or SEC filing.

TargetAcquirerPriceARR / RevMultipleTypeClosedSource
Splunk(SPLK)Cisco Systems$28.0B~$4.0B ARR at close7.0xStrategic2024-03-18view ↗
HashiCorp(HCP)IBM$6.4B~$646M LTM revenue (FY25 expected)9.9xStrategic2025-02-27view ↗
Smartsheet(SMAR)Blackstone + Vista Equity Partners + ADIA$8.4B$1.1B ARR (Q2 FY25)7.7xPE Take-Private2025-01-22view ↗
Informatica(INFA)Salesforce$8.0B~$1.0B ARR (cloud subscription)8.0xStrategic2025-11-18view ↗
Squarespace(SQSP)Permira$6.9B~$1.0B LTM revenue5.0xPE Take-Private2024-10-15view ↗
Recorded FutureMastercard$2.65B~$300M ARR (private; estimated)8.8xStrategic2024-12-18view ↗
Altair Engineering(ALTR)Siemens$10.6B~$650M LTM revenue (HPC + simulation SaaS)16.3xStrategic2025-03-31view ↗
ServiceTitan(TTAN)IPO (Nasdaq listing)$6.3B (IPO market cap day-1 close)$685M LTM revenue (Q3 FY25)9.2xStrategic2024-12-12view ↗
Multiples computed against publicly disclosed ARR or LTM revenue at announcement. Strategic deals tend to clear at 7-10x; PE take-privates at 5-7x; AI-strategic plays at 10-16x.
Per-deal context and methodology notes
Splunk / Cisco Systems (7.0x ARR)

Largest software acquisition in Cisco history. $157/share cash. 31% premium over unaffected share price. Splunk continued AR/ARR growth post-close drove the headline multiple.

Cisco IR press release, 18 March 2024
HashiCorp / IBM (9.9x LTM Revenue)

$35/share cash. Among the higher 2024-25 strategic multiples; reflects strategic value of Terraform + Vault for IBM hybrid cloud positioning.

IBM press release, 27 February 2025
Smartsheet / Blackstone + Vista Equity Partners + ADIA (7.7x ARR)

$56.50/share cash. Standard PE take-private multiple at 7.7x given 17% YoY growth and approaching profitability. Used as a comp for many private SaaS deals in the $1B+ ARR range.

Blackstone announcement, 24 September 2024
Informatica / Salesforce (8.0x ARR)

$25/share cash. Multiple computed against ~$1B cloud ARR; total Informatica revenue larger, but cloud ARR is the strategically relevant slice for Data Cloud / Agentforce integration.

Salesforce IR press release, 18 November 2025
Squarespace / Permira (5.0x LTM Revenue)

$46.50/share cash, with founder Anthony Casalena rolling significant equity. Lower multiple reflects mid-teens growth and competitive SaaS website builder category.

Permira closing announcement, 15 October 2024
Recorded Future / Mastercard (8.8x ARR)

Threat intelligence vertical SaaS. ARR figure is a Bloomberg/Reuters-reported estimate (Recorded Future was private); multiple is approximate.

Mastercard press release, 18 December 2024
Altair Engineering / Siemens (16.3x LTM Revenue)

High multiple reflects unique simulation IP + AI workflow positioning. Vertical industrial SaaS commands premium for technical moats. Useful as upper-bound vertical SaaS comp.

Siemens press release, 31 March 2025
ServiceTitan / IPO (Nasdaq listing) (9.2x LTM Revenue)

Vertical SaaS IPO. Day-1 close at ~$104/share gave ~$8.8B EV. Multiple range 9.2-12x depending on net cash adjustments. Included as IPO comp; not M&A but represents a public-market exit multiple for the same fundamental analysis.

ServiceTitan IR, IPO pricing 11 December 2024

Why EV/EBITDA Is Gaining Relevance for Mature SaaS

As a cohort of public SaaS companies has matured and reached profitability, institutional investors are increasingly applying EV/EBITDA alongside EV/Revenue. A company with $1B ARR and 20% EBITDA margin has a different risk profile than a company with $200M ARR burning cash at 30% margin. EV/EBITDA captures that difference; EV/Revenue does not.

As of Q1 2026, the median EV/EBITDA for the broad public SaaS index is approximately 26.6x. This compares to the S&P 500 at roughly 22x EV/EBITDA, suggesting that even profitable SaaS still commands a modest premium for software economics (high margins, predictable recurring revenue). See the historical trends page for how this evolved.

Key Terms on This Page

EV/Revenue
Enterprise Value divided by trailing-twelve-month revenue. The standard public SaaS valuation multiple, applicable to companies that report GAAP revenue under US public-company disclosure rules.
EV/EBITDA
Enterprise Value divided by trailing-twelve-month EBITDA. Used alongside EV/Revenue for profitable mature SaaS where margin matters as much as growth. Median public SaaS EV/EBITDA is 26.6x as of Q1 2026.
SaaS Capital Index
Equal-weighted median EV/Revenue multiple across approximately 100 publicly traded pure-play SaaS companies, published monthly by SaaS Capital since 2013. The most widely cited primary reference for public SaaS multiples.
BVP Nasdaq Emerging Cloud Index
Market-cap-weighted index of 60-80 cloud and SaaS companies, maintained by Bessemer Venture Partners and Nasdaq. Available as daily FRED time series NASDAQEMCLOUD. Skews higher than SaaS Capital due to growth-tilted constituents.
Top quartile / bottom quartile
P75 and P25 of the multiple distribution within an index. Top quartile public SaaS reaches 13.8x EV/Revenue in Q1 2026; bottom quartile sits at 1.8x. The wide range reflects growth-rate dispersion across the constituent set.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why do top-quartile public SaaS companies trade at 13x while the median is 6x?
Top-quartile companies are typically growing at 40%+ with strong NRR (115%+) and Rule of 40 scores above 50. The median includes many slower-growth, maturing SaaS companies trading on profitability rather than growth. The distribution is highly skewed: the top 10% of companies drive most of the headline multiple premiums. Growth rate is the single largest predictor of where a company sits in the distribution.
How often does the SaaS Capital Index update?
The SaaS Capital Index updates monthly with data from approximately 100 publicly traded pure-play SaaS companies. It tracks the median EV/Revenue multiple and has been published since 2013, making it one of the most consistent long-term data series for public SaaS valuations.
What is the BVP Nasdaq Emerging Cloud Index?
The BVP Nasdaq Emerging Cloud Index (EMCLOUD) is a benchmark index of publicly listed cloud and SaaS companies maintained by Bessemer Venture Partners and Nasdaq. It includes around 60-80 companies weighted by market cap. EMCLOUD skews toward faster-growing companies and typically shows higher median multiples than the broader SaaS Capital Index. Both are valid reference points; use SaaS Capital for a broader market picture and EMCLOUD for growth-stage comparisons.
Last verified 2 May 2026 · Sourced from Software Equity Group quarterly reports, public 10-K filings, IPO comparables, and PitchBook excerpts

Editorial independence: SaasValuationMultiple.com is reader-supported. Some outbound links to M&A platforms, brokers, and SaaS metrics tools may earn us a referral fee at no cost to you. Multiple ranges, valuation analysis, and recommendations are independent and based on Software Equity Group, public 10-Ks, IPO comparables, and PitchBook excerpts. We never recommend a platform solely because they pay us.

Updated 2 May 2026